Tanks in World War 2 Forum Index

Dedicated to the Tanks in World War 2 and World War 2 in general, in association with Panzerworld

Please note, that the forum has moved to a new location. Be sure update your bookmarks for the new Tanks in World War 2 Forum.

This forum will remain closed as an archive.

Eigth Air Force What-if

This forum is locked: you cannot post, reply to, or edit topics.   This topic is locked: you cannot edit posts or make replies.    Tanks in World War 2 Forum Index -> Air Warfare
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
Ricky
Administrator
Administrator

Joined: 10 May 2004
Posts: 11708
Location: Luton, UK

PostPosted: Tue Jan 22, 2008 4:52 pm    Post subject: Eigth Air Force What-if Reply with quote

I was wondering...

what would have been the outcome if, when the USA entered the war and sent their bombers off to the UK to pound Germany, they were actually persuaded by the RAF that massed daylight raids were simply too costly - particularly without escorts - and started bombing by night.

discuss...
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Lone Wolf
Technical Sergeant
Technical Sergeant

Joined: 14 Jun 2006
Posts: 788
Location: Merseyside, UK

PostPosted: Tue Jan 22, 2008 6:08 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

A flipant answer might be that they'd all end up in Portugal or Iceland because the Yanks were p**s poor navigators and had not spent years eating carrots like the RAF. This genuine wartime planning document, recently declassified, proves it.

Only joking USA - please don't take offence.




USAAF Nigh Raids.JPG

Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Ossian
First Lieutenant
First Lieutenant

Joined: 30 Sep 2005
Posts: 1431
Location: Bonnie Scotland

PostPosted: Tue Jan 22, 2008 7:35 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Lone Wolf,
USAAF bombing had a 100% accuracy rate....
... they invariably hit the ground

To answer the real question, look at the RAF night bombing record in say 1940 and '41 -- IIRC it was "well, we hit Germany" most of the time.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Lone Wolf
Technical Sergeant
Technical Sergeant

Joined: 14 Jun 2006
Posts: 788
Location: Merseyside, UK

PostPosted: Tue Jan 22, 2008 7:56 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Ossian wrote:
Lone Wolf,
USAAF bombing had a 100% accuracy rate....
... they invariably hit the ground


.. or the water.

Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Lone Wolf
Technical Sergeant
Technical Sergeant

Joined: 14 Jun 2006
Posts: 788
Location: Merseyside, UK

PostPosted: Tue Jan 22, 2008 7:58 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

double post

Last edited by Lone Wolf on Tue Jan 22, 2008 9:23 pm; edited 1 time in total
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Hubsu
Technician 5th Class
Technician 5th Class

Joined: 28 Feb 2005
Posts: 165

PostPosted: Tue Jan 22, 2008 8:17 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

It would have lessened the pressure on LW fighter organization and bloomed the LW night fighter production. Since the RAF and USAF lacked a capable night fighter escort in numbers on 1943 -44 the losses would have risen a lot for both the RAF and USAF, since Germany could have focus the aerial defence of the reich to a single air arm.

Night and day bombings combined made the Luftwaffe single engined fighter force to strech even more, than what they were if there would only be the night bombing threat from the west.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Revere
Second Lieutenant
Second Lieutenant

Joined: 26 Apr 2005
Posts: 1094
Location: Iowa, US

PostPosted: Tue Jan 22, 2008 9:36 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Wouldve cluttered the skys and turned the allies into zombies, also wouldve hindered the americans from hitting up the brit ladies at the clubs at night while the RAF boys were off bombing Germany. The great thing about bombs is there smart, they always hit the ground.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Hoosier
First Sergeant
First Sergeant

Joined: 11 May 2005
Posts: 904
Location: Bloomington, Indiana USA

PostPosted: Wed Jan 23, 2008 12:41 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

As it were, the Allies bombed their targets around the clock.
Day AND night.
Reminds me of the RAF pilots during the Battle of Britain. They were worn-down and exhausted from multiple intercept sorties, day after day.
Imagine the exhaustion of the Luftwaffe pilots and ground-crews from round the clock bombings. Not to mention flak-crews.
The military and civilians never got a good-nights sleep. Factory workers get sloppy and pilots can't concentrate.
I think the RAF and USAAF got it right personally.

Tim
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
majorwoody10
Major
Major

Joined: 20 Sep 2005
Posts: 1898
Location: ca.usa

PostPosted: Thu Jan 24, 2008 2:03 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

if we had bothered to enforce the "no fly zone" we mandated on the german airforce in 1919 , we wouldnt have had to bomb germany to rubble twenty years later , and then rebuild it too.

what agency or country do we have to blame for this rather expensive oversight ? were there any whistle blowers ?
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Hubsu
Technician 5th Class
Technician 5th Class

Joined: 28 Feb 2005
Posts: 165

PostPosted: Thu Jan 24, 2008 2:38 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

majorwoody10 wrote:
what agency or country do we have to blame for this rather expensive oversight ?


Russians? The German air force training establishment at Lipetsk trained 230 pilots between 1925-1933.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
majorwoody10
Major
Major

Joined: 20 Sep 2005
Posts: 1898
Location: ca.usa

PostPosted: Fri Jan 25, 2008 12:45 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

i wouldnt care how nice the airfeild and facillities were , i would absolutely refuse to train my air force at any place called "lipstick "
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
sinissa
Technician 3rd Class
Technician 3rd Class

Joined: 25 Nov 2006
Posts: 570

PostPosted: Fri Jan 25, 2008 5:39 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

majorwoody10 wrote:
i wouldnt care how nice the airfeild and facillities were , i would absolutely refuse to train my air force at any place called "lipstick "


That place in USSR did not exsisted. It is Lipetsk.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Ossian
First Lieutenant
First Lieutenant

Joined: 30 Sep 2005
Posts: 1431
Location: Bonnie Scotland

PostPosted: Fri Jan 25, 2008 5:48 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Some jokes do not get past the language barrier....
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Lone Wolf
Technical Sergeant
Technical Sergeant

Joined: 14 Jun 2006
Posts: 788
Location: Merseyside, UK

PostPosted: Sat Jan 26, 2008 1:26 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Ossian wrote:
Some jokes do not get past the language barrier....


Shirley Knott.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Ossian
First Lieutenant
First Lieutenant

Joined: 30 Sep 2005
Posts: 1431
Location: Bonnie Scotland

PostPosted: Sat Jan 26, 2008 7:41 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

A frayed knot
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Ricky
Administrator
Administrator

Joined: 10 May 2004
Posts: 11708
Location: Luton, UK

PostPosted: Sun Jan 27, 2008 4:08 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Ok people, since there seems to be an end to any serious answers...


Obviously, RAF & USAAF would have to work together much more closely (you don't want two bomber streams heading to the same target!).

German night-time defences would be much more stretched - thus more nightfighters wold be produced, with more pilots and radar operators needed, which would mean less available daytime fighters - though this is unlikely to make much of a dent in the numbers of daytime fighters now available to keep on the Eastern Front. Ironically, that might even hurt the Germans, as it means their inefficient and overloaded logistics system out East would need to be bringing out a load of extra fuel, ammo, spares etc for these fighters...

The results of the bombing would, I think, be much the same.

One possible result is the P-51 does not enter widespread service. Nobody will push for a single-seat escort fighter when there is nothing to escort...
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Display posts from previous:
This forum is locked: you cannot post, reply to, or edit topics.   This topic is locked: you cannot edit posts or make replies.    Tanks in World War 2 Forum Index -> Air Warfare All times are GMT
Page 1 of 1

 
Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum
You cannot attach files in this forum
You can download files in this forum


Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group